linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regmap: regmap-w1: Fix build troubles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170710153247.vwkjsiqlp4r3zhcb@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:32:47 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
Cc:     "Alex A. Mihaylov" <minimumlaw@...bler.ru>,
        Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: regmap-w1: Fix build troubles

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:17:17PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:19:35PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Like I say I provided a tag for this and didn't get any request to
> > pull/apply the update in the other direction so it is extremely
> > disappointing to see that the header move went ahead after that without
> > the regmap support being included and someone else is having to come
> > along and clean up the mess.

> FWIW I am just the messenger, who actually pointed out the issue
> _before_ it happened in the threads of both patchsets. I expected
> this to be properly solved by you and Greg. Since this did not
> work out regmap seems now the logical subsystem for the fix.

Well, I can't really apply it till after -rc1 since I'd have to pick a
random commit in Linus' tree to do it and that doesn't make him happy
usually.  Since it's not actually breaking the build or anything I'll
hold off till -rc1 and apply it then.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)