[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707110808040.1799@nanos>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 08:09:16 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] smp/hotplug updates for 4.13
On Sun, 9 Jul 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > + /* Wait for the CPU to reach CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE */
> > wait_for_completion(&st->done);
> > + BUG_ON(!cpu_online(cpu));
>
> I realize this isn't actually a new BUG_ON(), just a moved one, but
> can we *please* just agree to get rid of these machine-killing
> idiocies?
>
> The fact that it would be a bug if this triggers doesn't excuse it one
> whit. BUG_ON() is simply bad.
>
> Either it's a "this cannot happen", in which case it should be
> deleted, or it's a "if this ever happens, we really should notice it",
> in which case it should probably be a
>
> if (WARN_ON)ONCE(..))
> return -EBUSY;
>
> or something.
>
> That routine very much has an existing error path for failure to bring
> up a CPU, dammit!
>
> THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR KILLING THE MACHINE THERE!
Agreed. I noticed when I moved the code, but then forgot. Will queue a fix.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists