[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH6sp9Mu41r=ePgacCC6UP0bqvbCypeSicxPiU=FJjrxkj81kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:08:03 +0200
From: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>
To: Mark Rogers <mail@...k-rogers.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
sayli karnik <karniksayli1995@...il.com>,
driverdevel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: ks7010: fix styling WARNINGs
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Mark Rogers <mail@...k-rogers.org> wrote:
> Thank you for your feedback. I guess when making this patch I had the
> preferred coding style in mind, but didn't ask myself if making the code
> conform to it would truly improve readability.
>
> I agree with all of your comments. Do you think the best course of
> action is to create a new patch with this change alone and forget the
> rest?
It's up to you. You could send a couple of patches fixing these
things, or just do one patch fixing one thing.
>
> - DPRINTK(1, "ks7010_sdio_remove()\n");
> + DPRINTK(1, "%s()\n", __func__);
>
> Sorry about the newbie questions and bad patch, I will do better with
> the next one. Thanks again for your time and feedback, I really
> appreciate it.
It's pretty much what staging is for. Don't worry about it.
Frans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists