linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] rtmutex: remove unnecessary adjust prio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170712163537.7ipr27jmvxmwjfqt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:35:37 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>, mingo@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
        "open list:LOCKING PRIMITIVES" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rtmutex: remove unnecessary adjust prio

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:14:49AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:39:24 +0800
> Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> > Any comments for this little change? It's passed on 0day testing.
> 
> I think the problem was that this was a third patch after two
> documentation patches. Where, people put documentation review at the
> bottom of their priority list.
> 
> This should have been sent as separate patch on its own.

My problem was the sparse changelog, which forces me to think hard and
thus is landed on the 'later' queue, which moves at glacial speeds.