[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170712224045.4bsa6vngowr72kzk@treble>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:40:45 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] x86: ORC unwinder (previously undwarf)
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 03:36:05PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017-07-12 17:32:25 -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > If you want perf to be able to use ORC instead of DWARF for user space
> > binaries, that's not currently possible, though I don't see any
> > technical blockers for doing so. Perf would need to be taught to read
> > ORC data.
>
> Right, that's what I was hoping for.
>
>
> > And I think it should be possible to convert DWARF to ORC, assuming the
> > DWARF data is trusted. We could probably add an objtool subcommand for
> > that.
>
> That'd be pretty helpful.
Can I ask why? Is DWARF too slow, or is it something else?
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists