linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v5 11/38] mm: introduce an additional vma bit for powerpc pkey

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1499899228.2865.43.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2017 08:40:28 +1000
From:   Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:     Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@...il.com,
        hbabu@...ibm.com, arnd@...db.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 11/38] mm: introduce an additional vma bit for powerpc
 pkey

On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 15:23 -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
> Just copying over makes checkpatch.pl unhappy. It exceeds 80 columns.

Which is fine to ignore in a case like that where you remain consistent
with the existing code.

Ben.