linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] rtmutex: remove unnecessary adjust prio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ce4ed6d3-49bc-dc6f-b0c3-a3a1296b68c7@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:13:45 +0800
From:   Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
        "open list:LOCKING PRIMITIVES" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rtmutex: remove unnecessary adjust prio



On 07/13/2017 12:35 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:14:49AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:39:24 +0800
>> Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Any comments for this little change? It's passed on 0day testing.
>>
>> I think the problem was that this was a third patch after two
>> documentation patches. Where, people put documentation review at the
>> bottom of their priority list.
>>
>> This should have been sent as separate patch on its own.
> 
> My problem was the sparse changelog, which forces me to think hard and
> thus is landed on the 'later' queue, which moves at glacial speeds.
> 

Yes, I should mentioned I didn't find out any reasons from the history
changelogs.

Thanks for reminder this! :)

Regards
Alex