[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707172153180.1933@nanos>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 21:53:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>, len.brown@...el.com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, yang.zhang.wz@...il.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle
periods
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 7/17/2017 12:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Of course, this all assumes a Gaussian distribution to begin with, if we
> > get bimodal (or worse) distributions we can still get it wrong. To fix
> > that, we'd need to do something better than what we currently have.
> >
>
> fwiw some time ago I made a chart for predicted vs actual so you can sort
> of judge the distribution of things visually
Predicted by what?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists