[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJk7otP6VBde7cFdMBRgQQB_rQpCSi24tRmC9bMmfo5Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:54:53 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dt: chosen property for kaslr-seed
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 05:38:36PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Document then /chosen/kaslr-seed property (and its interaction with the
>
> s/then/the/
>
>> EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL API).
>
> "dt-bindings: chosen: ..." for the subject.
I'll send a v2 with these fixed and the Acks added.
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt
>> index dee3f5d9df26..0cdb43b268e5 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt
>> @@ -5,9 +5,27 @@ The chosen node does not represent a real device, but serves as a place
>> for passing data between firmware and the operating system, like boot
>> arguments. Data in the chosen node does not represent the hardware.
>>
>> +The following properties are recognized:
>>
>> -stdout-path property
>> ---------------------
>> +
>> +kaslr-seed
>> +-----------
>
> Is there some reason we would not feed this to other things needing
> entropy and therefore should have a more generic name?
I'll let Ard answer this better than me, but IIRC, he wanted a narrow use.
>> +
>> +This property is used when booting with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE to seed
>> +the entropy used to randomize the kernel image base address location. It
>> +is parsed as a u64 value, e.g.
>
> Why limit the size to 64-bit and why does it matter how the data is
> interpretted?
IIRC, u64 is sufficient. (And note I'm just documenting what exists...)
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + chosen {
>> + kaslr-seed = <0xfeedbeef 0xc0def00d>;
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> +Note that when booting through EFI when EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL is supported,
>> +this value will be overwritten by the EFI stub.
>
> Isn't this always true? The bootloader will overwrite. Just in the EFI
> case, the EFI stub is part of the bootloader from a functional (and not
> packaging) standpoint.
I thought it best to call this out so that no one could get confused
if they wanted to understand how to use kaslr-seed with an EFI system.
(i.e. just implement EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL instead.)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists