linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Bluetooth: btusb: Fix memory leak in play

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <596DD6AE.2030704@rock-chips.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:36:46 +0800
From:   jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
To:     Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
CC:     briannorris@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Bluetooth: btusb: Fix memory leak in play_deferred

Hi Oliver,

On 07/18/2017 04:41 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 18.07.2017, 16:08 +0800 schrieb jeffy:
>>> I am afraid not. We cannot silently drop one part of a transmission.
>>> I am afraid that the correct algorithm, if we encounter an error at
>>> that stage, is to abort the operation and report an error.
>>>
>> so i should break the loop when error happens right?
>
> Yes
ok, i'll do that.
>
>>
>> and i uploaded 2 version of patches, which one do you prefer to go on?
>
> Where to?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9847037
and
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9846617

>
> 	Regards
> 		Oliver
>
>
>
>