[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1500370901.502.6.camel@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:41:41 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: briannorris@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Bluetooth: btusb: Fix memory leak in
play_deferred
Am Dienstag, den 18.07.2017, 17:36 +0800 schrieb jeffy:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On 07/18/2017 04:41 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >
> > Am Dienstag, den 18.07.2017, 16:08 +0800 schrieb jeffy:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I am afraid not. We cannot silently drop one part of a transmission.
> > > > I am afraid that the correct algorithm, if we encounter an error at
> > > > that stage, is to abort the operation and report an error.
> > > >
> > > so i should break the loop when error happens right?
> >
> > Yes
> ok, i'll do that.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > and i uploaded 2 version of patches, which one do you prefer to go on?
> >
> > Where to?
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9847037
> and
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9846617
I think that as soon as one URB fails, you should not even try
to submit any other deferred URBs. You are taking one out from
the middle of a sequence. That cannot be right.
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists