[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170718100655.topzzdu6n7rd6euk@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:06:55 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "ASoC: ux500: drop platform DAI assignments"
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:21:18AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:51:27PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> > subsystem. This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
> > patches. Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are
> > doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're
> > doing.
> I try to, but reverts are special as the default commit summary tend to
> already contain the subsystem prefix and some maintainers find that
> sufficient (or even preferred as this also makes reverts stand out more
> clearly).
Reverts shouldn't be special - they're just regular patches and should
have sensible changelogs like any others.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists