linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "ASoC: ux500: drop platform DAI assignments"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:06:55 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "ASoC: ux500: drop platform DAI assignments"

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:21:18AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:51:27PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> > subsystem.  This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
> > patches.  Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are
> > doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're
> > doing.

> I try to, but reverts are special as the default commit summary tend to
> already contain the subsystem prefix and some maintainers find that
> sufficient (or even preferred as this also makes reverts stand out more
> clearly).

Reverts shouldn't be special - they're just regular patches and should
have sensible changelogs like any others.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)