[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170719151951.GL32632@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 17:19:51 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] livepatch: introduce shadow variable API
On Tue 2017-07-18 15:36:27, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> Who knew naming things was so difficult :)
>
> There's been a bunch of feedback on terminology, so I'll just issue a
> collective reply to Petr's last msg on the topic. These were my
> thoughts on naming clarification:
>
> v1,v2 v3
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> obj, original data obj, parent object
> num, numerical description of new data id, data identifier
> new_data data
> new_size data_size
IMHO, "size" might be enough in the context when it is used.
>
> Miroslav also suggested additional text explaining the id / data
> identifier field. How about something like this:
>
> ---
>
> ================
> Shadow Variables
> ================
>
> ...
>
> A global, in-kernel hashtable associates parent pointers and a numeric
> identifier with shadow variable data.
I would slightly reformulate the above sentece:
A global, in-kernel hashtable associates pointers to parent objects
and a numeric identifier of the shadow data.
> Specifically, the parent pointer
> serves as the hashtable key, while the numeric id further filters
> hashtable queries. The numeric identifier is a simple enumeration that
> may be used to describe shadow variable versions (for stacking
> livepatches), class or type (for multiple shadow variables per parent),
> etc. Multiple shadow variables may attach to the same parent object,
> but their numeric identifier distinguises between them.
Sounds good to me.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists