[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1707192048460.15946@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:50:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] livepatch: introduce shadow variable API
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2017-07-18 15:36:27, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> > Who knew naming things was so difficult :)
> >
> > There's been a bunch of feedback on terminology, so I'll just issue a
> > collective reply to Petr's last msg on the topic. These were my
> > thoughts on naming clarification:
> >
> > v1,v2 v3
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > obj, original data obj, parent object
> > num, numerical description of new data id, data identifier
> > new_data data
> > new_size data_size
>
> IMHO, "size" might be enough in the context when it is used.
I agree.
> >
> > Miroslav also suggested additional text explaining the id / data
> > identifier field. How about something like this:
> >
> > ---
> >
> > ================
> > Shadow Variables
> > ================
> >
> > ...
> >
> > A global, in-kernel hashtable associates parent pointers and a numeric
> > identifier with shadow variable data.
>
> I would slightly reformulate the above sentece:
>
> A global, in-kernel hashtable associates pointers to parent objects
> and a numeric identifier of the shadow data.
>
> > Specifically, the parent pointer
> > serves as the hashtable key, while the numeric id further filters
> > hashtable queries. The numeric identifier is a simple enumeration that
> > may be used to describe shadow variable versions (for stacking
> > livepatches), class or type (for multiple shadow variables per parent),
> > etc. Multiple shadow variables may attach to the same parent object,
> > but their numeric identifier distinguises between them.
s/distinguises/distinguishes/
> Sounds good to me.
Yes, thanks for the paragraph. It sounds good combined with Petr's
proposal.
Miroslav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists