[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170719094431.308c095b@xeon-e3>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:44:31 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@...hat.com>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
otubo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, vkuznets@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netvsc: Remove redundant use of ipv6_hdr()
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:19:28 +0200
Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@...hat.com> wrote:
> This condition already uses an object of type ipv6hdr in the line above.
> Use the object directly instead of calling ipv6_hdr
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> index 63c98bb..06d591c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static u32 net_checksum_info(struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> if (ip6->nexthdr == IPPROTO_TCP)
> return TRANSPORT_INFO_IPV6_TCP;
> - else if (ipv6_hdr(skb)->nexthdr == IPPROTO_UDP)
> + else if (ip6->nexthdr == IPPROTO_UDP)
> return TRANSPORT_INFO_IPV6_UDP;
> }
>
Patch looks fine.
Network patches go through netdev@...r.kernel.org not linux driver mailing list.
I will add it to my next patch of patches that are going to netdev for net-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists