[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <930440229.36662246.1500486483200.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:48:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
otubo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, vkuznets@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netvsc: Remove redundant use of ipv6_hdr()
----- Original Message -----
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:19:28 +0200
> Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > This condition already uses an object of type ipv6hdr in the line above.
> > Use the object directly instead of calling ipv6_hdr
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> > b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> > index 63c98bb..06d591c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> > @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static u32 net_checksum_info(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >
> > if (ip6->nexthdr == IPPROTO_TCP)
> > return TRANSPORT_INFO_IPV6_TCP;
> > - else if (ipv6_hdr(skb)->nexthdr == IPPROTO_UDP)
> > + else if (ip6->nexthdr == IPPROTO_UDP)
> > return TRANSPORT_INFO_IPV6_UDP;
> > }
> >
>
> Patch looks fine.
> Network patches go through netdev@...r.kernel.org not linux driver mailing
> list.
> I will add it to my next patch of patches that are going to netdev for
> net-next.
>
Thanks for the heads up. Will take that into consideration next time.
It's worth pointing out that MAINTAINERS points that files under
drivers/net/hyperv are to be sent to devel@...uxdriverproject.org.
Perhaps that should be updated.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists