linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the staging.current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170719060702.GA9423@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:07:02 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Marcus Wolf <linux@...f-Entwicklungen.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the
 staging.current tree

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 01:07:28PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   drivers/staging/Kconfig
>   drivers/staging/Makefile
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   dd55d44f4084 ("staging: vboxvideo: Add vboxvideo to drivers/staging")
> 
> from the staging.current tree and commit:
> 
>   874bcba65f9a ("staging: pi433: New driver")
> 
> from the staging tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Yeah, I know this is going to happen, I'll be fixing it up when
staging-linus gets into Linus's tree.

thanks,

greg k-h