[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170719014603.19029-17-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:46:02 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, jack@...e.cz,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
hch@...radead.org, ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mhocko@...e.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, dave@...olabs.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 16/17] mem/memcg: cache rightmost node
Such that we can optimize __mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node().
The only overhead is the extra footprint for the cached pointer,
but this should not be an issue for mem_cgroup_tree_per_node.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 3df3c04d73ab..2ef9328ace2e 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static const char *const mem_cgroup_lru_names[] = {
struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node {
struct rb_root rb_root;
+ struct rb_node *rb_rightmost;
spinlock_t lock;
};
@@ -386,6 +387,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz,
struct rb_node **p = &mctz->rb_root.rb_node;
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz_node;
+ bool rightmost = true;
if (mz->on_tree)
return;
@@ -397,8 +399,11 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz,
parent = *p;
mz_node = rb_entry(parent, struct mem_cgroup_per_node,
tree_node);
- if (mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess)
+ if (mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess) {
p = &(*p)->rb_left;
+ rightmost = false;
+ }
+
/*
* We can't avoid mem cgroups that are over their soft
* limit by the same amount
@@ -406,6 +411,10 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz,
else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess)
p = &(*p)->rb_right;
}
+
+ if (rightmost)
+ mctz->rb_rightmost = &mz->tree_node;
+
rb_link_node(&mz->tree_node, parent, p);
rb_insert_color(&mz->tree_node, &mctz->rb_root);
mz->on_tree = true;
@@ -416,6 +425,10 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz,
{
if (!mz->on_tree)
return;
+
+ if (&mz->tree_node == mctz->rb_rightmost)
+ mctz->rb_rightmost = rb_next(&mz->tree_node);
+
rb_erase(&mz->tree_node, &mctz->rb_root);
mz->on_tree = false;
}
@@ -496,16 +509,15 @@ static void mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
static struct mem_cgroup_per_node *
__mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *mctz)
{
- struct rb_node *rightmost = NULL;
struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz;
retry:
mz = NULL;
- rightmost = rb_last(&mctz->rb_root);
- if (!rightmost)
+ if (!mctz->rb_rightmost)
goto done; /* Nothing to reclaim from */
- mz = rb_entry(rightmost, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, tree_node);
+ mz = rb_entry(mctz->rb_rightmost,
+ struct mem_cgroup_per_node, tree_node);
/*
* Remove the node now but someone else can add it back,
* we will to add it back at the end of reclaim to its correct
@@ -5850,6 +5862,7 @@ static int __init mem_cgroup_init(void)
node_online(node) ? node : NUMA_NO_NODE);
rtpn->rb_root = RB_ROOT;
+ rtpn->rb_rightmost = NULL;
spin_lock_init(&rtpn->lock);
soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[node] = rtpn;
}
--
2.12.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists