[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170719014603.19029-18-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:46:03 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, jack@...e.cz,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
hch@...radead.org, ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mhocko@...e.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, dave@...olabs.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 17/17] block/cfq: cache rightmost rb_node
For the same reasons we already cache the leftmost pointer,
apply the same optimization for rb_last() calls. Users must
explicitly do this as rb_root_cached only deals with the
smallest node.
Cc: axboe@...com
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
---
This is part of the rbtree internal caching series:
https://lwn.net/Articles/726809/
block/cfq-iosched.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 92c31683a2bb..57ec45fd4590 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -94,11 +94,13 @@ struct cfq_ttime {
*/
struct cfq_rb_root {
struct rb_root_cached rb;
+ struct rb_node *rb_rightmost;
unsigned count;
u64 min_vdisktime;
struct cfq_ttime ttime;
};
#define CFQ_RB_ROOT (struct cfq_rb_root) { .rb = RB_ROOT_CACHED, \
+ .rb_rightmost = NULL, \
.ttime = {.last_end_request = ktime_get_ns(),},}
/*
@@ -1183,6 +1185,9 @@ static struct cfq_group *cfq_rb_first_group(struct cfq_rb_root *root)
static void cfq_rb_erase(struct rb_node *n, struct cfq_rb_root *root)
{
+ if (root->rb_rightmost == n)
+ root->rb_rightmost = rb_next(n);
+
rb_erase_cached(n, &root->rb);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(n);
@@ -1239,20 +1244,24 @@ __cfq_group_service_tree_add(struct cfq_rb_root *st, struct cfq_group *cfqg)
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
struct cfq_group *__cfqg;
s64 key = cfqg_key(st, cfqg);
- bool leftmost = true;
+ bool leftmost = true, rightmost = true;
while (*node != NULL) {
parent = *node;
__cfqg = rb_entry_cfqg(parent);
- if (key < cfqg_key(st, __cfqg))
+ if (key < cfqg_key(st, __cfqg)) {
node = &parent->rb_left;
- else {
+ rightmost = false;
+ } else {
node = &parent->rb_right;
leftmost = false;
}
}
+ if (rightmost)
+ st->rb_rightmost = &cfqg->rb_node;
+
rb_link_node(&cfqg->rb_node, parent, node);
rb_insert_color_cached(&cfqg->rb_node, &st->rb, leftmost);
}
@@ -1355,7 +1364,7 @@ cfq_group_notify_queue_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg)
* so that groups get lesser vtime based on their weights, so that
* if group does not loose all if it was not continuously backlogged.
*/
- n = rb_last(&st->rb.rb_root);
+ n = st->rb_rightmost;
if (n) {
__cfqg = rb_entry_cfqg(n);
cfqg->vdisktime = __cfqg->vdisktime +
@@ -2204,7 +2213,7 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,
st = st_for(cfqq->cfqg, cfqq_class(cfqq), cfqq_type(cfqq));
if (cfq_class_idle(cfqq)) {
rb_key = CFQ_IDLE_DELAY;
- parent = rb_last(&st->rb.rb_root);
+ parent = st->rb_rightmost;
if (parent && parent != &cfqq->rb_node) {
__cfqq = rb_entry(parent, struct cfq_queue, rb_node);
rb_key += __cfqq->rb_key;
--
2.12.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists