lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:39:34 +0200
From:   Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@...hu>
To:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: ACPI: IRQ x override to edge, high

Hi,

on two different Intel based POS machines where UARTs are crucial,
I see such messages (4.11.7 now, seen with older kernels, too):

[    0.919239] ACPI: IRQ 4 override to edge, high
[    0.919334] pnp 00:02: Plug and Play ACPI device, IDs PNP0501 (active)
[    0.919697] ACPI: IRQ 3 override to edge, high
[    0.919784] pnp 00:03: Plug and Play ACPI device, IDs PNP0501 (active)
[    0.920154] ACPI: IRQ 11 override to edge, high
[    0.920247] pnp 00:04: Plug and Play ACPI device, IDs PNP0501 (active)
[    0.920449] pnp 00:05: Plug and Play ACPI device, IDs PNP0501 (disabled)
[    0.920811] ACPI: IRQ 5 override to edge, high
[    0.920908] pnp 00:06: Plug and Play ACPI device, IDs PNP0501 (active)
[    0.921272] ACPI: IRQ 6 override to edge, high
[    0.921363] pnp 00:07: Plug and Play ACPI device, IDs PNP0501 (active)

It seems that the PnP and the ACPI tables are inconsistent and ACPI wins.
Because of this, the UART IRQs don't work, write() or tcdrain() stalls.

Is there a kernel parameter that convinces the Linux ACPI to avoid
touching the PnP IRQs?

Thanks in advance,
Zoltán Böszörményi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ