linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] vfio: platform: reset: Add Broadcom FlexRM reset module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:35:57 +0530
From:   Anup Patel <anup.patel@...adcom.com>
To:     Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@...tualopensystems.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] vfio: platform: reset: Add Broadcom FlexRM reset module

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Scott Branden
<scott.branden@...adcom.com> wrote:
> Hi Anup,
>
> NAK - as indicated in internal review please use unmodified Broadcom legal
> header in its own comment block.

I had addressed your internal review comments and used
standard GLPv2 header (also present in other drivers). The
only part I missed was to keep additional comments as
separate comment block (which you had not mentioned
in internal review).

Anyways, I will update the comment header but I think
using "NAK" in such situation is a bit over-kill

Regards,
Anup