lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0368986a-0274-25b4-931a-6c4ddfc4d4e3@microchip.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:05:46 +0300
From:   Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Crypto: atmel-ecc: Make a couple of local functions
 static



On 07/19/2017 12:24 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> Functions atmel_ecc_i2c_client_alloc and atmel_ecc_i2c_client_free are
> local to the source and no not need to be in the global scope. Make
> them static.
> 
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> symbol 'atmel_ecc_i2c_client_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
> symbol 'atmel_ecc_i2c_client_free' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>

Thanks,
ta

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ