linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Crypto: atmel-ecc: Make a couple of local functions static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170803062239.GE12039@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2017 14:22:40 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Crypto: atmel-ecc: Make a couple of local functions
 static

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:24:15AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> Functions atmel_ecc_i2c_client_alloc and atmel_ecc_i2c_client_free are
> local to the source and no not need to be in the global scope. Make
> them static.
> 
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> symbol 'atmel_ecc_i2c_client_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
> symbol 'atmel_ecc_i2c_client_free' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

Patch applied.  Thanks.
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt