[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170720110254.GB14156@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 07:02:54 -0400
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: H??kon Bugge <Haakon.Bugge@...cle.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rds: Make sure updates to cp_send_gen can be observed
On (07/20/17 12:28), H??kon Bugge wrote:
> cp->cp_send_gen is treated as a normal variable, although it may be
> used by different threads.
I'm confused by that assertion. If you look at the comments right
above the change in your patch, there is a note that
acquire_in_xmit/release_in_xmit are the synchronization/serialization
points.
Can you please clarify?
> --- a/net/rds/send.c
> +++ b/net/rds/send.c
> @@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ int rds_send_xmit(struct rds_conn_path *cp)
> * The acquire_in_xmit() check above ensures that only one
> * caller can increment c_send_gen at any time.
> */
> - cp->cp_send_gen++;
> - send_gen = cp->cp_send_gen;
> + send_gen = READ_ONCE(cp->cp_send_gen) + 1;
> + WRITE_ONCE(cp->cp_send_gen, send_gen);
>
--Sowmini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists