linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf script python: Provide perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:11:36 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Arun Kalyanasundaram <arunkaly@...gle.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>,
        David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all
 handlers

Em Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:51:31AM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram escreveu:
> My apologies. Yes, I did make a couple of changes to the patch. I was
> not sure if I should be sending a v2 since the previous one was a rfc.
> Please ignore this patch, I will resend this highlighting the new
> changes made.

Thanks a lot! It takes some time to get the whole process going
smoothly, but we'll get there :-)

- Arnaldo
 
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Em Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:46:39AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> >> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:01:13PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote:
> >> > The process_event python hook receives a dict with most perf_sample
> >> > entries.
> >>
> >> hi,
> >> was there any change to the rfc post?
> >
> > I was wondering that, please stick a v1, v2, etc to the subject, and
> > state the changes across versions, to make things clear.
> >
> > - Arnaldo
> >
> >> thanks,
> >> jirka
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate
> >> > the introduction of this dict and do not receive it. This patch series
> >> > adds the dict to all handlers, aiming to unify the information passed to
> >> > them.
> >> >
> >> > This change adds an additional argument to the affected handlers. To
> >> > keep backwards compatibility (and avoid unnecessary work), do not pass
> >> > the aforementioned dict if the number of arguments signals that handler
> >> > version predates this change.
> >> >
> >> > In addition, provide time_enabled, time_running and counter value in the
> >> > perf_sample dict.
> >> >
> >> > Initial Discussion: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/1/108
> >> >
> >> > Arun Kalyanasundaram (5):
> >> >   perf script python: Allocate memory only if handler exists
> >> >   perf script python: Refactor creation of perf sample dict
> >> >   perf script python: Add sample_read to dict
> >> >   perf script python: Add perf_sample dict to tracepoint handlers
> >> >   perf script python: Generate hooks with additional argument
> >> >
> >> >  .../util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c    | 246 +++++++++++++++------
> >> >  1 file changed, 184 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > 2.14.0.rc0.284.gd933b75aa4-goog
> >> >