[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170721171542.27639-13-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 18:15:38 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 12/16] ARM: Simplify condition checks in swp_handler
We now check the validity of the condition code before calling
the UNDEF handlers, so we can simplify swp_handler by only
checking for ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND, which indicates that
this is not a SWP instruction.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c | 15 ++-------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c b/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
index 3bda08bee674..2683c559e0ff 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
@@ -179,20 +179,9 @@ static int swp_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS, 1, regs, regs->ARM_pc);
- res = arm_check_condition(instr, regs->ARM_cpsr);
- switch (res) {
- case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS:
- break;
- case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL:
- /* Condition failed - return to next instruction */
- regs->ARM_pc += 4;
- return 0;
- case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND:
- /* If unconditional encoding - not a SWP, undef */
+ /* If unconditional encoding - not a SWP, undef */
+ if (arm_check_condition(instr, regs->ARM_cpsr) == ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND)
return -EFAULT;
- default:
- return -EINVAL;
- }
if (current->pid != previous_pid) {
pr_debug("\"%s\" (%ld) uses deprecated SWP{B} instruction\n",
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists