linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 3/4] dt-bindings: mfd: da9052: support TSI as ADC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 22 Jul 2017 21:08:29 +0200
From:   Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/4] dt-bindings: mfd: da9052: support TSI as ADC

Hi,

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 08:09:08AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Yes, but you dropped all the Acks in v6. That is supposed to mean that there
> was a substantial change to the patch, and that it needs to be re-reviewed.
> For the hwmon patches, I ran a diff against v5 and noticed that there was no
> change between v5 and v6, yet you dropped my Acks. Do you really expect us
> to do all that work on your behalf ?
> 
> Sorry if I sound a bit annoyed. That is because I _am_ a bit annoyed.
> Please keep in mind that you are taking our time.

FWIW, I did not drop them, but forgot to add the ones I received in
PATCHv5. Mainly since I initially did not plan to resend the whole
patchset, but then decided otherwise.

Sorry anyways.

-- Sebastian

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)