[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve=7HsNHZ443Fs08O7Ya4mMfgtq3nD-6znkeKCjQtGe3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 01:13:25 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI / boot: Not all platform require acpi_reduced_hw_init()
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> On Saturday, July 22, 2017 04:53:52 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 06:04:19 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > I'd rather do it at the time when acpi_reduced_hw_init() actually needs to be
>> > overridden by at least one platform.
>>
>> Do you mean as folded into some other patch or just as a preparatory
>> patch in some future series?
> Any of the above would work for me.
Logically it should be a separate change as I can see (I have already
locally prepared patches for that one platform).
Thanks for review.
P.S. Are you going to apply first 3 then from this series?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists