linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI / boot: Not all platform require acpi_reduced_hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5622080.aq77V1utKd@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Sun, 23 Jul 2017 00:02:51 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI / boot: Not all platform require acpi_reduced_hw_init()

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 04:53:52 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 06:04:19 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> Some platform might take care of legacy devices on theirs own.
> >> Let's allow them to do that by exporting a weak function.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > I'd rather do it at the time when acpi_reduced_hw_init() actually needs to be
> > overridden by at least one platform.
> 
> Do you mean as folded into some other patch or just as a preparatory
> patch in some future series?
> 
> 

Any of the above would work for me.

Thanks,
Rafael