[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VejtJC87eWhxKcT_yWKR2kOWLOARGmhiK7S9WO4bCHYRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 04:53:52 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI / boot: Not all platform require acpi_reduced_hw_init()
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 06:04:19 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Some platform might take care of legacy devices on theirs own.
>> Let's allow them to do that by exporting a weak function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>
> I'd rather do it at the time when acpi_reduced_hw_init() actually needs to be
> overridden by at least one platform.
Do you mean as folded into some other patch or just as a preparatory
patch in some future series?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists