[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABb+yY3NNUE7YXAhBLpMzVZkB7Kgx6iZk8a--crHa9Wpw6Ls4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:11:48 +0530
From: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@....com>, Loc Ho <lho@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
Roy Franz <roy.franz@...ium.com>,
Harb Abdulhamid <harba@...eaurora.org>,
Matt Sealey <neko@...uhatsu.net>,
ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] firmware: arm_scmi: add basic driver infrastructure
for SCMI
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/07/17 06:32, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> Hi Roy, Matt, Nishant, Harb Abdulhamid, Loc,
>>
>> I have a gut feeling you guys were part of the SCMI spec committee. If
>> so, could you please chime in?
>>
>
> I take complete silence as no objection.
>
I take it as no self respecting developer/architect would stand by
your FUBAR implementation of SCMI.
SCMI calls
mbox_send_message(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct scmi_xfer *xfer);
whereas the API expects
mbox_send_message(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct controller_specific *xfer);
As the maintainer I have tried to explain it to you in a dozen ways.
If you still can't see how it's broken, you can't be helped.
Checking out until someone else has any point.
NAK.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists