[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.11.1707251814092.9683@mail.ewheeler.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:15:23 +0000 (UTC)
From: Eric Wheeler <bcache@...ts.ewheeler.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
cc: kent.overstreet@...il.com, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: v4.12: register_dcache lockdep problem on boot
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I get this one during boot...
>
> Pavel
> [ 12.717617] __lock_acquire+0x86/0x94a
> [ 12.720466] lock_acquire+0x4a/0x66
> [ 12.723223] ? mca_reap+0x56/0x115
> [ 12.725972] down_write_trylock+0x44/0x59
> [ 12.728737] ? mca_reap+0x56/0x115
> [ 12.731454] mca_reap+0x56/0x115
> [ 12.734131] mca_alloc+0x80/0x390
> [ 12.736741] bch_btree_node_get+0x76/0x27e
> [ 12.739324] run_cache_set+0x2c0/0x7c1
> [ 12.741866] register_bcache+0xc35/0x109b
> [ 12.744356] ? register_bcache+0xc35/0x109b
> [ 12.746826] ? x86_perf_event_set_period+0x187/0x20c
> [ 12.749305] ? __mutex_lock+0x2a/0x5d7
> [ 12.751725] ? bch_cache_set_alloc+0x577/0x577
> [ 12.754138] kobj_attr_store+0x10/0x1f
> [ 12.756508] ? kobj_attr_store+0x10/0x1f
> [ 12.758906] sysfs_kf_write+0x2f/0x41
> [ 12.761258] ? sysfs_file_ops+0x40/0x40
> [ 12.763521] kernfs_fop_write+0xd3/0x14a
> [ 12.765762] ? sysfs_file_ops+0x40/0x40
> [ 12.767948] ? kernfs_vma_page_mkwrite+0x67/0x67
> [ 12.770121] __vfs_write+0x1c/0x103
> [ 12.772076] ? vfs_write+0x93/0x13c
> [ 12.774058] ? __sb_start_write+0xeb/0x14c
> [ 12.776147] ? vfs_write+0x93/0x13c
> [ 12.778135] vfs_write+0xa1/0x13c
> [ 12.780033] SyS_write+0x3d/0x81
> [ 12.781854] do_int80_syscall_32+0x42/0x84
> [ 12.783631] entry_INT80_32+0x2e/0x2e
> [ 12.785357] EIP: 0xb7758c42
> [ 12.787015] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 2
> [ 12.788711] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 00000003 ECX: b7755000 EDX: 0000000a
> [ 12.790428] ESI: 0000000a EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfca9a0c ESP: bfca9954
> [ 12.792168] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b
> [ 12.793861] Code: 0f 85 94 00 00 00 68 da 7f e8 c4 68 f6 7d e8 c4 e8 58 e0 00 00 0f ff 83 c4 08 eb 7e 8b 47 0c 39 83 08 01 00 00 0f 84 1e 03 00 00 <0f> ff e9 17 03 00 00 85 db 74 0b 3b 43 10 74 e1 8b 1b 85 db 75
> [ 12.797697] ---[ end trace 6e213ee067267bec ]---
> [ 12.808884] bcache: bch_journal_replay() journal replay done, 0 keys in 2 entries, seq 4
> [ 12.822321] bcache: register_cache() registered cache device sdb1
> [ 13.378319] bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device sda3
It could be benign, try this patch:
-Eric
From: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>
mutex_destroy does nothing most of time, but it's better to call
it to make the code future proof and it also has some meaning
for like mutex debug.
Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@...ux.ewheeler.net>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
index 48b8c20..1f84791 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -2089,6 +2089,7 @@ static void bcache_exit(void)
if (bcache_major)
unregister_blkdev(bcache_major, "bcache");
unregister_reboot_notifier(&reboot);
+ mutex_destroy(&bch_register_lock);
}
static int __init bcache_init(void)
@@ -2106,6 +2107,7 @@ static int __init bcache_init(void)
bcache_major = register_blkdev(0, "bcache");
if (bcache_major < 0) {
+ mutex_destroy(&bch_register_lock);
unregister_reboot_notifier(&reboot);
return bcache_major;
}
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists