[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170725181535.GG18880@destiny>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:15:35 -0400
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennisz@...com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel-team@...com, Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/23] percpu: setup_first_chunk rename schunk/dchunk
to chunk
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 07:02:04PM -0400, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> From: "Dennis Zhou (Facebook)" <dennisszhou@...il.com>
>
> There is no need to have the static chunk and dynamic chunk be named
> separately as the allocations are sequential. This preemptively solves
> the misnomer problem with the base_addrs being moved up in the following
> patch. It also removes a ternary operation deciding the first chunk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Thanks,
Josef
Powered by blists - more mailing lists