[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1707261100400.1965-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:04:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@...hat.com>
cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dianders@...omium.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: USB disk speed regression WD Elements - with bisect result
22547c4cc4fe20698a6a85a55b8788859134b8e4
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Well I do have 4.13-rc1 kernel - where the only difference is the revert
> of mentioned patched - so I can provide probably traces from this one if that
> helps anything.
>
> What is not quite clear to me - why T440 works.
>
> Could this be in some way related to the fact that T61 is USB2 only old lenovo
> machine while T440 works with USB3 (new SuperSpeed USB device number...)
Very likely that is the reason. The hardware is different.
> So maybe there is some time-sensitive logic - where WD Elements
> decides to be USB2 or USB3 device ???
The decision has to be agreed upon on both sides -- the drive and the
kernel. If you enable debugging in the kernel, we'll have a better
picture of what it is deciding to do.
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists