linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Add support for MMC controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170726194522.7d64f7c2danrknfi@flea>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2017 21:45:22 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Add support for MMC
 controllers

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:09:41PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This is v3 of my MMC controller support series.
> >
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Chen-Yu Tsai (10):
> >   clk: sunxi-ng: Add interface to query or configure MMC timing modes.
> >   clk: sunxi-ng: Add MP_MMC clocks that support MMC timing modes
> >     switching
> >   clk: sunxi-ng: a83t: Support new timing mode for mmc2 clock
> >   mmc: sunxi: Support controllers that can use both old and new timings
> >   mmc: sunxi: Support MMC DDR52 transfer mode with new timing mode
> >   mmc: sunxi: Add support for A83T eMMC (MMC2)
> 
> So this series seems to be ready for inclusion, unless Ulf has further
> concerns about the clk usage.
> 
> The first mmc patch have build time dependencies on the first clk patch.
> Shall we put the clk patch on a separate immutable branch for both trees
> to pull? Or we could just merge everything through the mmc tree? I don't
> think we'll touch this part of the sunxi-ng clk driver for the remainder
> of this cycle.

I guess the easiest would be for it to go through Ulf tree, unless he
says otherwise of course :)

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)