linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Add support for MMC controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2017 13:19:50 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Add support for MMC controllers

On 26 July 2017 at 21:45, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:09:41PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > This is v3 of my MMC controller support series.
>> >
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > Chen-Yu Tsai (10):
>> >   clk: sunxi-ng: Add interface to query or configure MMC timing modes.
>> >   clk: sunxi-ng: Add MP_MMC clocks that support MMC timing modes
>> >     switching
>> >   clk: sunxi-ng: a83t: Support new timing mode for mmc2 clock
>> >   mmc: sunxi: Support controllers that can use both old and new timings
>> >   mmc: sunxi: Support MMC DDR52 transfer mode with new timing mode
>> >   mmc: sunxi: Add support for A83T eMMC (MMC2)
>>
>> So this series seems to be ready for inclusion, unless Ulf has further
>> concerns about the clk usage.
>>
>> The first mmc patch have build time dependencies on the first clk patch.
>> Shall we put the clk patch on a separate immutable branch for both trees
>> to pull? Or we could just merge everything through the mmc tree? I don't
>> think we'll touch this part of the sunxi-ng clk driver for the remainder
>> of this cycle.
>
> I guess the easiest would be for it to go through Ulf tree, unless he
> says otherwise of course :)

Okay, I have picked up the series and applied it for my next branch.

Thanks and kind regards
Uffe