[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2feff1a5-25b7-eb6c-7628-7c2257c56e95@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:01:30 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To: Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
CC: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"David.Laight@...lab.com" <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
"ashok.raj@...el.com" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ganesh GR <ganeshgr@...lsio.com>,
"asit.k.mallick@...el.com" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
"jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com" <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>,
Michael Werner <werner@...lsio.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"patrick.j.cramer@...el.com" <patrick.j.cramer@...el.com>,
"linuxarm@...wei.com" <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
"amira@...lanox.com" <amira@...lanox.com>,
"Bob.Shaw@....com" <Bob.Shaw@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] PCI: Enable PCIe Relaxed Ordering if supported
On 2017/7/27 3:05, Casey Leedom wrote:
> | From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
> | Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:44 AM
> |
> | On Jul 26, 2017 11:26 AM, "Casey Leedom" <leedom@...lsio.com> wrote:
> | |
> | | I think that the patch will need to be extended to modify
> | | drivers/pci.c/iov.c:sriov_enable() to explicitly turn off
> | | Relaxed Ordering Enable if the Root Complex is marked
> | for no RO TLPs.
> |
> | I'm not sure that would be an issue. Wouldn't most VFs inherit the PF's settings?
>
> Ah yes, you're right. This is covered in section 3.5.4 of the Single Root I/O
> Virtualization and Sharing Specification, Revision 1.0 (September 11, 2007),
> governing the PCIe Capability Device Control register. It states that the VF
> version of that register shall follow the setting of the corresponding PF.
>
> So we should enhance the cxgb4vf/sge.c:t4vf_sge_alloc_rxq() in the same
> way we did for the cxgb4 driver, but that's not critical since the Relaxed
> Ordering Enable supersedes the internal chip's desire to use the Relaxed
> Ordering Attribute.
>
> Ding, send me a note if you'd like me to work that up for you.
>
Ok, you could send the change log and I could put it in the v8 version together,
will you base on the patch 3/3 or build a independence patch?
Ding
> | Also I thought most of the VF configuration space is read only.
>
> Yes, but not all of it. And when a VF is exported to a Virtual Machine,
> then the Hypervisor captures and interprets all accesses to the VF's
> PCIe Configuration Space from the VM.
>
> Thanks again for reminding me of the subtle aspect of the SR_IOV
> specification that I forgot.
>
> Casey
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists