[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5ee1292-00ff-6579-7e51-ce5d9de21b58@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:27:33 -0500
From: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] ipmi: use atomic_dec_not_zero()
I missed this until now, and I see it hasn't been applied yet. It's
queued for the next release.
Thanks,
-corey
On 01/30/2017 12:47 PM, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> instead of atomic_add_unless(value, -1, 0)
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> index 9f69995..961d677 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> @@ -3851,7 +3851,7 @@ static void handle_new_recv_msgs(ipmi_smi_t intf)
> * If the pretimout count is non-zero, decrement one from it and
> * deliver pretimeouts to all the users.
> */
> - if (atomic_add_unless(&intf->watchdog_pretimeouts_to_deliver, -1, 0)) {
> + if (atomic_dec_not_zero(&intf->watchdog_pretimeouts_to_deliver)) {
> ipmi_user_t user;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists