[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN6PR12MB1652FB3CC2DA7D3DF9C5D809F7BF0@BN6PR12MB1652.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 17:26:57 +0000
From: "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>
To: 'Kees Cook' <keescook@...omium.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "Zhu, Rex" <Rex.Zhu@....com>,
"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
"Zhang, Hawking" <Hawking.Zhang@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: rv: Use designated initializers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: keescook@...gle.com [mailto:keescook@...gle.com] On Behalf Of
> Kees Cook
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 1:16 PM
> To: Alex Deucher
> Cc: LKML; David Airlie; amd-gfx list; Maling list - DRI developers; Deucher,
> Alexander; Zhu, Rex; Koenig, Christian; Zhang, Hawking
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: rv: Use designated initializers
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> wrote:
> >> As done for vega10 in commit 3ddd396f6b57 ("drm/amd/powerplay: Use
> >> designated initializers") mark other tableFunction entries with designated
> >> initializers. The randstruct plugin requires designated initializers for
> >> structures that are entirely function pointers.
> >>
> >> Cc: Rex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@....com>
> >> Cc: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@....com>
> >> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> >> ---
> >> If I can get an Ack for this, I'll carry it in the gcc-plugins tree, unless
> >> you think this is worth landing for v4.13, in which case, please take it
> >> now. :)
> >>
> >
> > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
> >
> > I'm happy to take this through my tree if that is ok with you.
>
> Since the randstruct patch depends on this fix, it's likely best to go
> through my tree unless you can get this into v4.13. (Since then when
> the randstruct patch lands in v4.14, it'll already be there.) I'm fine
> either way.
Go ahead and take it through your tree. Thanks!
Alex
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists