[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQtoHHrvLC3dQPm1YFrJ_yv6J2TGSd4ffyoQd8NnJOnyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:15:45 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
y2038@...ts.linaro.org, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/6] ipc: mqueue: Replace timespec with timespec64
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> struct timespec is not y2038 safe. Replace
> all uses of timespec by y2038 safe struct timespec64.
>
> Even though timespec is used here to represent timeouts,
> replace these with timespec64 so that it facilitates
> in verification by creating a y2038 safe kernel image
> that is free of timespec.
>
> The syscall interfaces themselves are not changed as part
> of the patch. They will be part of a different series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
> Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/audit.h | 6 +++---
> ipc/mqueue.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> kernel/audit.h | 2 +-
> kernel/auditsc.c | 12 ++++++------
> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
Something is wrong here ... I already merged your audit y2038 fixes,
you can see them in Linus' tree right now.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists