linux-kernel - Re: Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1501427926.22879.92.camel@gmx.de>
Date:   Sun, 30 Jul 2017 17:18:46 +0200
From:   Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:     nisus@...chan.it, "Paul G. Allen" <pgallen@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity - Yes there is a
 blatant violation

On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 10:15 +0000, nisus@...chan.it wrote:
> 
> Again, Yes I am an attorney, yes Bruce Perens is correct, Yes I know 
> what I'm talking about in this field more than you American Programmers, 
> no you do not know what you are talking about if you have not studied 
> law.

If your motivation for posting to LKML, a technical forum, is to
dispense pro bono publico advice to hapless victims, bless you, but
LKML is not the appropriate forum.  Nor is it appropriate for pro bono
advocatus, pro bono piscator, or any other conceivable variant of pro
bono discussion not ending in the latin word for kernel.

	-Mike