linux-kernel - Re: Suspend-resume failure on Intel Eagle Lake Core2Duo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707310935370.2314@nanos>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:45:53 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@...el.com>
cc:     Martin Peres <martin.peres@...ux.intel.com>,
        jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Suspend-resume failure on Intel Eagle Lake Core2Duo

On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Tomi Sarvela wrote:
> On 28/07/17 19:26, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Did you change anything else compared to the tests before ?
> 
> I did check that the problem persisted in linus-HEAD before testing your
> patch. The testing was done in order (reading from console logs I happen to
> still have in one window):

What I still do not understand is why this would affect the suspend path in
any way.

Can you remove the previous patch and apply the one below. If it resumes,
please provide the data from the trace buffer again.

Thanks,

	tglx

8<--------------
--- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
+++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
@@ -459,3 +459,11 @@ static inline void irq_remove_debugfs_en
 {
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS */
+
+extern bool irq_suspend_resume;
+
+static inline void irq_trace_state(const char *what, struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+	trace_printk("%s %d state %08x\n", what, irq_desc_get_irq(desc),
+		     irqd_get(&desc->irq_data));
+}
--- a/kernel/irq/pm.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/pm.c
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
 
 #include "internals.h"
 
+bool irq_suspend_resume;
+
 bool irq_pm_check_wakeup(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
 	if (irqd_is_wakeup_armed(&desc->irq_data)) {
@@ -120,6 +122,7 @@ void suspend_device_irqs(void)
 	struct irq_desc *desc;
 	int irq;
 
+	irq_suspend_resume = true;
 	for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
 		unsigned long flags;
 		bool sync;
@@ -127,7 +130,9 @@ void suspend_device_irqs(void)
 		if (irq_settings_is_nested_thread(desc))
 			continue;
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
+		irq_trace_state("presuspend", desc);
 		sync = suspend_device_irq(desc);
+		irq_trace_state("postsuspend", desc);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
 
 		if (sync)
@@ -150,8 +155,9 @@ static void resume_irq(struct irq_desc *
 	/* Pretend that it got disabled ! */
 	desc->depth++;
 	irq_state_set_disabled(desc);
-	irq_state_set_masked(desc);
+
 resume:
+	irq_state_set_masked(desc);
 	desc->istate &= ~IRQS_SUSPENDED;
 	__enable_irq(desc);
 }
@@ -172,9 +178,14 @@ static void resume_irqs(bool want_early)
 			continue;
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
+		irq_trace_state("preresume", desc);
 		resume_irq(desc);
+		irq_trace_state("postresume", desc);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
 	}
+
+	if (!want_early)
+		irq_suspend_resume = false;
 }
 
 /**