linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] ipc: sem: Make sem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2sAwjQfkW9rLjYkb=TnoKTuqhJ5rMJZK8AWw8O0qtsVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:09:53 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] ipc: sem: Make sem_array timestamps y2038 safe

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> time_t is not y2038 safe. Replace all uses of
> time_t by y2038 safe time64_t.
>
> Similarly, replace the calls to get_seconds() with
> y2038 safe ktime_get_real_seconds().
> Note that this preserves fast access on 64 bit systems,
> but 32 bit systems need sequence counters.
>
> The syscall interface themselves are not changed as part of
> the patch. They will be part of a different series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>

Looks good. One detail:

> @@ -2310,7 +2310,7 @@ static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it)
>         sem_otime = get_semotime(sma);
>
>         seq_printf(s,
> -                  "%10d %10d  %4o %10u %5u %5u %5u %5u %10lu %10lu\n",
> +                  "%10d %10d  %4o %10u %5u %5u %5u %5u %10llu %10llu\n",
>                    sma->sem_perm.key,
>                    sma->sem_perm.id,
>                    sma->sem_perm.mode,
> @@ -2319,8 +2319,8 @@ static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it)
>                    from_kgid_munged(user_ns, sma->sem_perm.gid),
>                    from_kuid_munged(user_ns, sma->sem_perm.cuid),
>                    from_kgid_munged(user_ns, sma->sem_perm.cgid),
> -                  sem_otime,
> -                  sma->sem_ctime);
> +                  (unsigned long long) sem_otime,
> +                  (unsigned long long) sma->sem_ctime);
>

Unless I'm missing something here, you can drop the cast to
unsigned long long: time64_t is always 'long long' and won't
cause a warning here.

We only need a cast like this when printing the members of 'struct
 timespec64', since that can be either 'long long' or 'long', when
it is defined as an alias for timespec.

        Arnd