[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1501509867.29303.303.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:04:27 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>,
Tien Hock Loh <thloh@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: drop unnecessary includes from
include/linux/gpio/driver.h
On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 15:48 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 12:53 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > Some of include directives in include/linux/gpio/driver.h are
> > > unneeded because the header does not need to know the content of
> > > struct device, irq_chip, etc. Just declare they are structures.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, <linux/irqhandler.h> and
> > > <linux/spinlock_types.h>
> > > turned out to be necessary for irq_flow_handler_t and spinlock_t,
> > > respectively.
> > >
> > > Each driver should include what it needs without relying on what
> > > is
> > > implicitly included from <linux/gpio/driver.h>. This will cut
> > > down
> > > unnecessary header parsing.
> >
> > If Linus is okay with the following proposal I would rather go with
> > it,
> > i.e. logical split the series to
> >
> > 1. Fix IRQ related headers inclusion
> > 2. Fix pinconf-generic.h inclusion
> > 3. Fix OF headers inclusion (btw, of_gpio.h is not enough there?)
>
> That works fine with me, but also one big patch actually, I do not
> want to make it too much work to refactor obviously incorrect things.
>
> As soon as we have rough consensus on this and the build robot
> are happy I will apply it to GPIO and also pull it into the pinctrl
> subsystem.
For me priorities like this:
1) it works after the patch being applied (no regressions);
2) it makes code cleaner at the end;
3) it is presented in logically split parts.
So, as long as 1) and 2) are satisfied I can neglect on 3).
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists