[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170801063642.GA1839@light.dominikbrodowski.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 08:36:42 +0200
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To: "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Issue with commit de3ef1eb1cd - PM / core: Drop run_wake flag
from struct dev_pm_info [Was: MEI-related WARN_ON() triggered during
resume-from-sleep on v4.13-rc2+]
Alexander, Rafael,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 02:05:22AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Actually, I don't think it will make any difference. Please check the
> one attached this time.
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 05:25:03AM +0000, Usyskin, Alexander wrote:
> Dominik, can you try comment out "if (!pci_dev_run_wake(pdev))"
> at drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c (around line 223) to set domain callbacks by force
> to see if this is indeed the case?
thanks for taking a look at this issue. I have tested both approaches, and
either works fine and solves the issue. Which approach is better I cannot
say, though.
Thanks,
Dominik
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists