[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B749D525F@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 06:49:42 +0000
From: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
"Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Issue with commit de3ef1eb1cd - PM / core: Drop run_wake flag
from struct dev_pm_info [Was: MEI-related WARN_ON() triggered during
resume-from-sleep on v4.13-rc2+]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dominik Brodowski [mailto:linux@...inikbrodowski.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 09:37
> To: Usyskin, Alexander <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>; Rafael J. Wysocki
> <rafael@...nel.org>
> Cc: Winkler, Tomas <tomas.winkler@...el.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>; Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>; Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>; ACPI
> Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: Issue with commit de3ef1eb1cd - PM / core: Drop run_wake flag
> from struct dev_pm_info [Was: MEI-related WARN_ON() triggered during
> resume-from-sleep on v4.13-rc2+]
>
> Alexander, Rafael,
>
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 02:05:22AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Actually, I don't think it will make any difference. Please check the
> > one attached this time.
>
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 05:25:03AM +0000, Usyskin, Alexander wrote:
> > Dominik, can you try comment out "if (!pci_dev_run_wake(pdev))"
> > at drivers/misc/mei/pci-me.c (around line 223) to set domain callbacks
> > by force to see if this is indeed the case?
>
> thanks for taking a look at this issue. I have tested both approaches, and
> either works fine and solves the issue. Which approach is better I cannot say,
> though.
>
> Thanks,
> Dominik
Thanks for envestigation.
Our HW requires PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NEEDS_RESUME as we need to go via reset during suspend and this cannot be initiated while in runtime suspended.
We will work on the patch.
Thanks
Tomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists