[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1501592780.29303.324.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:06:20 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net, marc.zyngier@....com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, mmarek@...e.com, albert@...ive.com,
will.deacon@....com, boqun.feng@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
mingo@...hat.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jslaby@...e.com, davem@...emloft.net,
mchehab@...nel.org, hverkuil@...all.nl, rdunlap@...radead.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, mhiramat@...nel.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
mcgrof@...nel.org, dledford@...hat.com, bart.vanassche@...disk.com,
sstabellini@...nel.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
vgupta@...opsys.com, airlied@...hat.com, jk@...abs.org,
chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, Jason@...c4.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ncardwell@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ups.riscv.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/15] lib: Add shared copies of some GCC library
routines
On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 17:59 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> Many ports (m32r, microblaze, mips, parisc, score, and sparc) use
> functionally identical copies of various GCC library routine files,
> which came up as we were submitting the RISC-V port (which also uses
> some of these).
>
> This patch adds a new copy of these library routine files, which are
> functionally identical to the various other copies. These are
> availiable via Kconfig as CONFIG_GENERIC_$ROUTINE, which currently
> isn't
> used anywhere.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
That's why we are putting tags before own SoB line(s)
In two cases in the patch you have
+
+
for no reason. I think you may remove second empty line.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists