[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a215872-d6fe-b4fc-3cf7-c9e11358dac2@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 14:04:00 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] arm, arm64, cpufreq: frequency- and
cpu-invariant accounting support for task scheduler
Hi Russell,
On 27/07/17 20:33, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
[...]
> Patch high level description:
>
> [ 01/10] Fix to free cpumask cpus_to_visit
> [ 02/10] Default (empty, weak) arch_set_freq_scale() implementation
> [03,04/10] Call arch_set_freq_scale() from two cpufreq drivers
> (arm_big_little and cpufreq-dt)
> [ 05/10] FIE
> [ 06/10] Allow CIE inlining
> [07,08/10] Enable frequency- and cpu-invariant accounting on arm
Would you have time to review patch 7 and 8. I already got an Acked-by
from the ARM64 maintainer for the arm64 related counterpart functionality.
Thanks,
-- Dietmar
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists