[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6dec7b60-e262-67ab-d29e-8537085dadcd@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 18:38:43 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] arm, arm64, cpufreq: frequency- and
cpu-invariant accounting support for task scheduler
Hi Rafael,
On 27/07/17 20:33, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
[...]
> Patch high level description:
>
> [ 01/10] Fix to free cpumask cpus_to_visit
> [ 02/10] Default (empty, weak) arch_set_freq_scale() implementation
> [03,04/10] Call arch_set_freq_scale() from two cpufreq drivers
> (arm_big_little and cpufreq-dt)
Could you please have a look at patches 2-4 which touch the cpufreq
subsystem.
Thanks,
-- Dietmar
[....]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists