[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170802141637.77maxxkwbjgl7juz@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:16:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, will.deacon@....com,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 1/4] mm: Rework {set,clear,mm}_tlb_flush_pending()
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 02:52:03PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 03:05:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 01:38:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > For this to work we need to rework migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page()
> > > > a little and move the test up into do_huge_pmd_numa_page().
> > > >
> > >
> > > Note that Nadav has a patch in parallel on it's way towards Andrew's
> > > tree that I suggested to always always check if a TLB flush is pending
> > > under the PTL. A conflict will happen but will be trivial to resolve.
> >
> > Got a link?
>
> Subject: Revert "mm: numa: defer TLB flush for THP migration as long as possible"
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170731164325.235019-4-namit@vmware.com
>
Thanks, yes that should be easy to resolve.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists